This Patrick Kane alleged rape case is weird to me.  Doesn't RAPE imply that there was a sexual encounter of some sort?  How is it in most cases THESE DAYS, women who are BRAVE ENOUGH to come forward are taken seriously...but in this case, regarding National Hockey League star Patrick Kane, the alleged victim seems to be the accused...accused of LYING!

In Mike Tyson's Case there were several factors that made the alleged victim's story questionable, however Mike Tyson was convicted and went to prison...while in the Patrick Kane Case, news reports are saying that he is likely to not even having to go to court!

The Disparities are MORE THAN OBVIOUS (in my opinion).

What do you think?

Here's The News Story:

PATRICK KANE'S ACCUSER HAS NOW OPTED OUT (FULL STORY LINK BELOW):

I'm not even going to get into the Ben Roethlisberger situation. ....Wait..... on second thought....Here you go... (The case against Ben was dropped also!)

Mike Tyson's Case: